FeaturedNationalVOLUME 19 ISSUE # 36

Elite capture: concept, significance and remedy

Various research studies published recently establish beyond the shadow of a doubt that Pakistan’s power elites are solely focused on serving and advancing their own narrow self-interest in utter disregard of the basic socio-economic needs of the rest of the populations. They have captured the corridors of power and make policies designed to make the rich richer, while more and more people keep slipping below the poverty line year after year

The capture of Pakistan’s resources by its power elite is a multifaceted issue, often referred to as “elite capture.” This term describes how a small, privileged group wields disproportionate influence and control over a country’s resources, policies, and institutions to serve their own interests, often at the expense of the broader population. In Pakistan, this phenomenon manifests in several ways.

A few political families and dynasties have long dominated Pakistan’s political landscape. They use their positions to maintain control over state resources and institutions. This includes influencing legislation, directing government spending to benefit their own constituencies, and securing lucrative government contracts for their businesses. The establishment is also part of the ruling elite in Pakistan. It has historically held significant power, often intervening in politics through coups and maintaining influence over national security and foreign policies. It also controls substantial economic resources, including vast land holdings, business enterprises, and real estate. This economic clout allows them to further entrench their power.

Among the ruling elite, an important class is that of wealthy industrialists and business tycoons who have considerable sway over economic policies. They often benefit from favorable tax policies, subsidies, and protectionist measures that stifle competition and innovation. This elite group also has significant lobbying power, ensuring that policies align with their interests.

On the other hand, large landowners in rural areas wield immense power over local populations. They control land and agricultural resources, influencing local economies and politics. Their dominance in rural areas often translates into political power at higher levels, perpetuating a cycle of control and influence. Scholars also include high-ranking officials in the judiciary and bureaucracy among the elite group with significant control over the administration of justice and governance. Corruption and nepotism within these institutions hinder efforts to reform and democratize. In recent years, owners of major media outlets have joined the ranks of elite classes. They can shape public opinion, influence political discourse, and protect the interests of the power elite through selective reporting and commentary.

The power elites have used national resources for self-aggrandizement through various means, including political patronage, corruption, and monopolizing economic opportunities. Politicians often secure lucrative government contracts for themselves or their allies. These contracts, often awarded without competitive bidding, lead to substandard projects and significant public losses. Politicians redirect development funds meant for public welfare projects to benefit their own constituencies, thereby securing voter loyalty and enhancing their own political power. Appointments to key government positions are often based on loyalty rather than merit, ensuring that bureaucrats and other officials remain loyal to the political elite. This creates a cycle of dependence and corruption.

The elite capture has caused severe damage to Pakistan’s economy and society. Due to lopsided and wrong policies, resources are concentrated in the hands of a few, leading to significant wealth and income disparities. This has exacerbated poverty and limited social mobility for the majority of the population. Elite capture has undermined the effectiveness and impartiality of state institutions, including the judiciary, law enforcement, and regulatory bodies.

Such a state of affairs not only militates against the imperatives of good governance but also leads to pervasive corruption, as elites use their positions to extract rents and privileges. This diverts resources away from public services and development projects towards benefiting a privileged few. Policies that favor the elite can stifle innovation, competition, and entrepreneurship. This hinders economic growth and development, keeping the country in a cycle of dependency and underdevelopment.

As we can see, rising inequality and lack of opportunities for the common people have led to social unrest, protests, and political instability. This creates a volatile environment that is detrimental to long-term development and stability. There is a consensus of opinion in the country that the time has come to introduce overdue reforms in all sectors of life to weaken the hold of a parasitic elite and thus put the country on the path of sustainable and balanced growth. The first step in this direction is to strengthen democratic institutions, promote transparency, and ensure free and fair elections. Electoral reforms can also limit the influence of money in politics.

Implementing progressive taxation, reducing subsidies for the wealthy, and promoting inclusive economic policies can help address economic disparities. Encouraging competition and supporting small and medium enterprises can also promote economic diversity. Reforming and strengthening institutions such as the judiciary, law enforcement, and regulatory bodies can enhance their independence and effectiveness. Addressing land ownership patterns and implementing land reforms can reduce the power of feudal elites and promote more equitable distribution of resources. The problem of elite capture is deeply entrenched, but with concerted efforts and comprehensive reforms, progress can be made towards a more equitable and inclusive society.

Share: